{"created":"2023-06-19T10:27:23.847746+00:00","id":217,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"066af2c2-e89b-4d8b-9c7d-7632e238ea7f"},"_deposit":{"created_by":13,"id":"217","owners":[13],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"217"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kusw.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000217","sets":["4:41:42"]},"author_link":["71"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2012-09","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"1","bibliographicPageEnd":"8","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"16","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"関西福祉大学社会福祉学部研究紀要"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿では，アメリカ合衆国における「成年被後見人の選挙権」の処遇について検討する．一般に言われているように，合衆国のほとんどの州では，なんらかの精神的疾患を理由として選挙権を剥奪するケースが多い．しかし，近年，これらの選挙権剥奪は見直されつつある．そのきっかけの一つとなったのが2001 年Doe v. Rowe 事件判決である．同判決では，「精神的疾患を原因とする成年被後見人」からの選挙権剥奪を定めるメイン州憲法２条１項を連邦憲法違反であると断じたのである．\n　ほとんどの州でみられる改正は，同判決が提示した問題点の一つを解消できてはいる．しかし，これらの改正をもってしても「平等保護条項」違反は免れないように思われる．","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_heading_23":{"attribute_name":"見出し","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_heading_banner_headline":"原著","subitem_heading_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"関西福祉大学社会福祉学部研究会"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1883-566X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"有田, 伸弘"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"71","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2012-11-06"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"16_1_01有田.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"375.9 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"本文（PDFファイル）","url":"https://kusw.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/217/files/16_1_01有田.pdf"},"version_id":"1797aeb6-7835-4c91-9c4b-b8a40277bdb8"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"成年被後見人","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"選挙権","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"デュー･プロセス","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"平等保護","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"制限選挙制度","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"アメリカ合衆国における「成年被後見人選挙権剥奪」の正当化理由の変遷","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"アメリカ合衆国における「成年被後見人選挙権剥奪」の正当化理由の変遷"},{"subitem_title":"The transition of justifi cation for the“ Guardianship Disenfranchisement” in the United States of America","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"13","path":["42"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2012-11-06"},"publish_date":"2012-11-06","publish_status":"0","recid":"217","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["アメリカ合衆国における「成年被後見人選挙権剥奪」の正当化理由の変遷"],"weko_creator_id":"13","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-19T10:44:00.865408+00:00"}